Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.